[CRISP-TEAM] the initial draft announcement

[Izumi Okutani]

Thanks John very much for letting me know.

> Is it possible to edit and correct the summary? ARIN�s proposal dated 21
> November 2014 was published to ARIN�s transition list and made available
> on the NRO-IANAXFER list on November 28 yet this summary does not mention
> it nor does it compare it in the chart.

Let's make sure to reflect the summary which includes ARIN community.



Craig,
may I confirm whether you are happy to work on this revision, or prefer
someone from ARIN region to edit the updated version on this summary?


Izumi

(2014/12/17 6:39), Sweeting, John wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/16/14, 4:23 PM, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> 
>> CRISP Team,
>>
>>
>> I brain stormed information to be included in the initial draft
>> announcement.
>>
>> Anything else you can think of?
>> I hope to confirm on the 3rd call.
>>
>> * The deadline:
>>     - Three days before (1/2) for as the 2nd draft?
>>       or Other suggestions?
>> * Mention about how we handle late comments or not?
>> * Link to the proposal document
>> * Key points we worked on:
>>     - SLA and AoC
>>     - MONC
>>     - details to be refered to Craig's PDF
>> * Overall schedule
>> * Ref: proposals from each RIR region
>>
>> "Key points we worked" is important in agreeing details, so I drafted
>> specific description, to be revised with your feedback. Thanks!
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The key points CRIPS Team has worked are on regional differences we
>> observed on two points. Please see "Summary of RIR proposals" for more
>> details.
>>
>> https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/Summary-of-RIR-proposals.pdf
>>
> 
> Is it possible to edit and correct the summary? ARIN�s proposal dated 21
> November 2014 was published to ARIN�s transition list and made available
> on the NRO-IANAXFER list on November 28 yet this summary does not mention
> it nor does it compare it in the chart.
> 
> 
>> 1. Agreement to be exchanged with the IANA function operator.
>>
>>    Differences:
>>     - RIPE community believes it is desirable to have a single SLA, and
>>       not AoC
>>     - Other communities propose AoC and SLA
>>
>>    Proposal:
>>     - Exchange an agreement which can serve as SLA with the IANA
>>       function operator
>>     - While there will be no document called AoC, intended contents of
>>       AoC will be reflected in the same agreement which covers SLA
>>
>>    Rationale:
>>     - All regions agree about the need for SLA
>>     - As long as contents of AoC is reflected, it does not matter
>>       whether a seperate document, or merged with SLA document
>>
>>
>> 2. Oversight body/fuction
>>
>>     Differences:
>>     -  LACNIC community prefers to have a broader based
>>        community group to review the performance of the
>>        IANA functions. Multi-stakeholder Oversight Numbers
>>        Council(MONC) is proposed.
>>     -  Some of the RIRs believe that MONC is complex and
>>        overly burdensome, to oversee the performance of a contract
>>        (over the past 12 months, the IANA functions operator has
>>        performed only eight transactions for the RIRs.)
>>
>>     Proposal:
>>     - The NRO (as the umbrella body through which all the
>>       RIRs will enter into any proposed contract with the IANA
>>       functions operator) can commit to convening a broad based
>>       community group, in a manner similar to the creation of the CRISP
>>       team
>>     - This will be done on an annual basis, to advise and report to
>>        the NRO Executive Council on the performance of the SLA during
>>        the past year.
>>
>>     Rationale: (This is my guessing - more than happy to be corrected)
>>      - Accomodates to conduct oversight without setting up a seperate
>>        entity for this role.
>>      - We already have experience from CRISP team on nominations and
>>        selection process.
>>
>>      (Personal observation:I'm not sure if we can say this is more
>>       light weight than MONC, if we go through nominations and
>>       selection process every year - any different observations?)
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Izumi
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
> 
> 
> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
>