[CRISP-TEAM] Suggested revisions expressed so far

[Izumi Okutani]

I very much agree Andrei. I got the same impression.

For the same reason (interest of time), I am suggesting to address this 
point, at least for V. NTIA Requirements. It's important we clearly show 
we meet their requirement.

I felt this section may be weak compared to others and may be worth 
considering the need for additional description. (we probably have no 
time so perhaps do it through open comments process beyond 18th)


In the check I did, I did try to cross check with questions and my 
general impression was we are OK on other sections, as long as we change 
orders. - I would still appreciate double checks by other members though.


Izumi


(2014/12/17 5:24), Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
> Michael,
>
> Thank you very much for agreeing to incorporate the proposed changes.
>
> When working on the IETF response, we were advised that we should answer
> the questions of the template point by point.
>
> For instance, in Section IV
>
> �       Description of operational requirements to achieve continuity of
> service and possible new service integration throughout the transition.
> �       Risks to operational continuity and how they will be addressed.
> �       Description of any legal framework requirements in the absence
> of the NTIA contract.
>
> all should be answered separately.
>
> Although in the interest of time we may leave it to the second revision.
>
> Regards,
>
> Andrei
>
> Michael Abejuela wrote on 16/12/14 20:29:
>> Izumi,
>>
>> Thank you for providing the recap, I was thinking of asking a last call
>> for any further comments as I incorporate revised text into the draft
>> proposal.  With regard to those that may be drafting any suggested text
>> sections, please feel free to reach out to me directly on any particulars.
>>   Otherwise, I will incorporate revisions as commented into the draft
>> proposal and circulate to the CRISP team later today (my time EST) so that
>> everyone will have it for review before our call tomorrow and we can have
>> a productive discussion to finalize our first CRISP team draft.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Michael
>>
>>