[CRISP-TEAM] Suggested revisions expressed so far

[Michael Abejuela]

Izumi,

Thank you for providing the recap, I was thinking of asking a last call
for any further comments as I incorporate revised text into the draft
proposal.  With regard to those that may be drafting any suggested text
sections, please feel free to reach out to me directly on any particulars.
 Otherwise, I will incorporate revisions as commented into the draft
proposal and circulate to the CRISP team later today (my time EST) so that
everyone will have it for review before our call tomorrow and we can have
a productive discussion to finalize our first CRISP team draft.

Thanks,
-Michael


-- 
Michael R. Abejuela

Associate General Counsel

ARIN

3635 Concorde Parkway

Suite 200

Chantilly, VA 20151

(703) 227-9875 (p)

(703) 263-0111 (f)

mabejuela at arin.net

 

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, copy, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.







On 12/16/14, 1:11 PM, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:

>CRISP Team,
>
>
>Just a recap of suggested revisions expressed on the mailing list so far.
>
>Hope I haven't missed anyone's comments.
>
>Anything else you'd like to add?
>
>It may be a little tight in schedule to reflect it, but I think it would
>still be useful to share, if you see anything we should consider.
>
> * Typo
>   - IPv6.ARPA --> IP6.ARPA
> * DNS
>   - Suggested text waiting to describe:
>     - the mapping between IPv4 or IPv6 addresses and in-addr.arpa or
>       ip6.arpa
>     - refer to the RFCs: delegation of the sub-domain name space
>       should follow the address management heirarchy
>       i.e., IANA -- RIRs (or portable assignment holders)
>     - Any SLA between the RIRs and the IANA operator should also deal
>       with this issue.
> * Overlap
>     - Replace with Andrei's suggested text
>     - Add Alan's comments:
>       The IANA operator should implement what is decided
>       (between IETF and RIRs)
> * Ideas from LACNIC
>    - Any suggested text?
>      (To be confirmed by Andres/anyone from LACNIC region)
>
>
>Thanks,
>Izumi
>
>_______________________________________________
>CRISP mailing list
>CRISP at nro.net
>https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp