[CRISP-TEAM] A proposal for the LACNIC CRISP Members
john.sweeting at twcable.com
Tue Dec 16 16:14:44 CET 2014
On 12/15/14, 4:34 PM, "Andres Piazza" <andres at lacnic.net> wrote:
>Taking in consideration that the MONC proposal made by LACNIC community
>could bring some pushback from other members of the group, and having
>heard about the issues that may be unconfortable for the rest of the
>CRISP Members, we would like to propose a compromise idea:
>- Eliminating the word Mulsitakeholder from the language of the proposal.
>- Not referring to the Council at the MoU level. We can mention the
>Council in the CRISP output just as a advisory body created by the
>NRO-EC for specific oversight purposes.
Can you list some examples of these please?
>- The report of the council would not be mandatory for NRO-EC.
>- No special seats at the council are reserved for other stakeholders
>such as Governments.
>- The creation of the council should still be referred at CRISP outcome.
>- The NRO-EC should as the RIR communities to appoint 3 members for each
>region considering diversity.
>I hope you can appreciate the effort done by the members of LACNIC
>community in this group.
Definitely appreciate the effort
>CRISP mailing list
>CRISP at nro.net
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
More information about the CRISP