[CRISP-TEAM] draft proposal: overlaps

[Nurani Nimpuno]

On 15 dec 2014, at 21:43, Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>> The amendment I am proposing has two objectives:
>> 
>> - Align the text with the description of the "overlaps" in the IETF response (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response), and
>> - Emphasize that the overlaps is a matter between the RIRs and the IETF, without any need for a third party (IANA operator will just implement whatever decided), rather than a "star" relationship RIRs-IANA, IETF-IANA.
>> 
>> Please let me know what you think

This makes sense. I support the new text. We can look at the specific wording of this text, but I agree that this relationship needs to be made clear in a way that doesn't insert the IANA operator between the RIRs and the IETF in this matter.
Nurani


> I agree with your "NEW" text (quoted below), but I'd suggest adding
> something like your above sentence about "The IANA operator should
> implement whatever is decided".
> 
> --apb (Alan Barrett)
> 
>> OLD:
>> 
>> The specific registries that are administered by the IANA per the authority delegated to the Internet Number Registry System are "Autonomous System (AS) Numbers", "IANA IPv4 Address Space Registry", and "IPv6 Global Unicast Address Assignments". Note that within each IANA registry, there are also special-purpose values, and those special-purpose values are outside the Internet Numbers Registry System and instead administered under the direction of the IETF. The delineation of the specific ranges delegated to the Internet Number Registry system is provided in RFC 7249.
>> 
>> 
>> NEW:
>> 
>> The IETF is responsible for policy relating to the entire IP address space and AS number space.  Through the IANA protocol parameters registries, the IETF delegates unicast IP address ("IANA IPv4 Address Space Registry" and "IPv6 Global Unicast Allocations Registry") and AS number space ("Autonomous System (AS) Numbers Registry”) to the RIR system [RFC7020]. Note that within each IANA registry, there are also special-purpose registries, which are outside the Internet Numbers Registry System and instead administered under the direction of the IETF. The delineation of the specific ranges delegated to the Internet Number Registry system is provided in RFC 7249.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp