[CRISP-TEAM] Notes CRISP Team 1st Teleconference December 9th 2014

[Izumi Okutani]

Hi German,


Thanks for setting up the e-mail for CRISP members.

I'd like to add one more to action.
German, would you be able to help us with this?

  Action: To gather proposals in each RIR regions and post on NRO website.

I recall this was a good suggestion made by Alan, and we already observe 
needs for this information in the APNIC region.

I'll make a call to CRISP Team members in a seperate thread, to share 
pointers to proposals from their respective regions, to help you gather 
references to all RIR proposals.


Thanks,
Izumi

(2014/12/10 16:24), German Valdez wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I'm attaching notes from yesterday teleconference
>
> There is 3 specific actions recorded
>
> Action: GV to create a private, closed mailing list for CRISP members as soon as possible
> Action: GV to update draft CRISP timeline (addition ofth teleconference, first draft to be submitted to the community on December 18th).
> Action: Craig, Andrei, Michael, and Esteban to prepare and share a first draft of the document before the next teleconference.
>
> May I have any comments/corrections in the following 24 hours before share the notes in the ianaxfer at nro.net mailing  list
>
> cheers
>
> German
>
> ===
>
> CRISP teleconference held on Tuesday, December 9th 2014 (13:00 UTC)
>
> Draft Agenda for CRISP teleconference 1
>
> 1. Working method (changes to initial charter)
>          ��� Chair, Vice-Chair of the CRISP team
>          ��� ianaxfer at nro.net mailing list
>          ��� Teleconferences
>                 ��� Quorum
>                 ��� Timeline for teleconferences
>          ��� Decision-making mechanism
>          ��� Appeals process
>          ��� Drafting tools
>
> 2. Scope of activity
>
> 3. Producing an RFP
>          ��� Survey of current drafting activity
>                 ��� ARIN, RIPE
>                 ��� Other communities (IETF, CWG)
>          ��� Process for making progress
>                 ��� Divide into sections, sub-teams
>                         ��� Existing arrangements, IANA stewardship process description
>                         ��� Proposed arrangements
>          ��� Timeline for drafting
>
> =======================================
> CRISP Members present during roll call:
>
> AFRINIC
> Alan P. Barrett, AB
> Mwendwa Kivuva, MK
> Ernest Byaruhanga, EB (Appointed RIR staff) ��� Was not on the call during roll call
>
> APNIC
> Dr Govind, DG
> Izumi Okutani, IO
> Craig Ng, CN (Appointed RIR staff)
>
> ARIN
> Bill Woodcock, BW
> John Sweeting, JS
> Michael Abejuala, MA (Appointed RIR staff)
>
> LACNIC
> Esteban Lescano, EL
> Nico Scheper, NS
> Andres Piazza AP (Appointed RIR staff) - Was not on the call during roll call
>
> RIPE NCC
> Nurani Nimpuno, NN
> Andrei Robachevsky, AR
> Paul Rendek, PR (Appointed RIR staff)
>
> EB and AP joined the teleconference after the roll call.
>
> German Valdez (GV) explained that the agenda was proposed by PR. No items were added to the agenda at this time.
>
> Chair, Vice-Chair of the CRISP team:
> GV read the names nominated for CRISP chair and vicenominations.
>
> AR proposed a roll call vote, NN and NS supported this motion, no objections were heard so GV proceeded to conduct the roll call in order to record the votes.
>
> The results were
>
> IO: 5 votes
> AB: 2 votes
> EL: 1 vote
> Abstentions: 2
>
> GV moved to accept IO as a chair and AB as vice chair of the CRISP team. No opposition was heard and IO and AB were congratulated.
>
> GV gave the floor to IO.
>
> IO asked for suggestions on which items needed clarification or discussion.
>
> GV suggested they decide on whether quorum would besuggested that the Secretariat could take notes that could be shared on the ianaxfer list after each teleconferences.
>
> After various possibilities were proposed regardingthe tight timeline and the fact that it might hold up the process. He said it would be better to look at the decision-making process instead of focusing on the quorum.
>
> IO said each region should encourage participation of at least one member (instead of defining quorum).
>
> BW suggested having a 24 hour window associated with each call, so that anyone who participated online within those 24 hours could also be counted towards quorum.
>
> EB noted that the CRISP charter does not define quorum for the decision-making process, so that would require changing the charter.
>
> Decision-making mechanism:
>
> IO said that the idea was to try to work on consensusthings would require voting.
>
> GV said that the expectation was that the super-majority criteria would only be used to approve the final draft and that everything else could be decided through consensus.
>
> ianaxfer at nro.net mailing list:
>
> IO noted that transparency and openness are extremely important.
>
> AR noted that the list is open to posting by non-CRISPpurposes (draft iterations, etc.) and using ianaxfer for transparency and seeking comments from the community.
>
> BW and NN agreed. No further comments were heard, socommunicate with the community.
>
> Action: GV to create a private, closed mailing list for CRISP members as soon as possible
>
> Timeline for teleconferences:
>
> IO said the proposed timeline seemed realistic and asked for comments.
>
> BW proposed retaining the same meeting time for all meetings.
>
> IO said they could discuss this further online, creating a poll with GV���s help.
>
> AR said they need to have a few volunteers who can draft the first text to be submitted to the community and volunteered himself.
>
> Because the first teleconference had taken placering the first draft with the community from the 15th to the 18th. He proposed splitting the material and starting to work on items 1 and 2, where there will probably not be much disagreement. Items 3 and 4 might need further debate and reaching agreements.
>
> Action: GV to update draft CRISP timeline (addition ofth teleconference, first draft to be submitted to the community on December 18th).
>
> IO asked for volunteers to prepare the first draft proposal.
>
> CN made a brief summary of the informal discussionsthe three regions��� ideas.
>
> EL and MA offered to help CN draft the comparison between the three proposals.
>
> AB asked that each RIR post their proposals on the NROwas available online at
>
> http://www.lacnic.net/en/web/transicion/inicio.
>
> After a brief discussion regarding the date of the nextnext meeting (11 November, 13.00 UTC) and to have the team of four volunteers discuss among themselves how to best share the workload.
>
> Action: Craig, Andrei, Michael, and Esteban to prepare and share a first draft of the document before the next teleconference.
>
> GV said he���d have the CRISP mailing list ready and use that to send the information for the next teleconference.
>
> After apologizing for having run a bit late, IO adjourned the meeting at 14.19 UTC.
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>