[CRISP-TEAM] Notes CRISP Team 1st Teleconference December 9th 2014

[German Valdez]

Hi

I'm attaching notes from yesterday teleconference

There is 3 specific actions recorded

Action: GV to create a private, closed mailing list for CRISP members as soon as possible
Action: GV to update draft CRISP timeline (addition ofth teleconference, first draft to be submitted to the community on December 18th).
Action: Craig, Andrei, Michael, and Esteban to prepare and share a first draft of the document before the next teleconference.

May I have any comments/corrections in the following 24 hours before share the notes in the ianaxfer at nro.net mailing  list

cheers

German

===

CRISP teleconference held on Tuesday, December 9th 2014 (13:00 UTC)
 
Draft Agenda for CRISP teleconference 1
 
1. Working method (changes to initial charter)
        • Chair, Vice-Chair of the CRISP team
        • ianaxfer at nro.net mailing list
        • Teleconferences
               • Quorum
               • Timeline for teleconferences
        • Decision-making mechanism
        • Appeals process
        • Drafting tools
 
2. Scope of activity
 
3. Producing an RFP
        • Survey of current drafting activity
               • ARIN, RIPE
               • Other communities (IETF, CWG)
        • Process for making progress
               • Divide into sections, sub-teams
                       • Existing arrangements, IANA stewardship process description
                       • Proposed arrangements
        • Timeline for drafting
 
=======================================
CRISP Members present during roll call:
 
AFRINIC
Alan P. Barrett, AB
Mwendwa Kivuva, MK
Ernest Byaruhanga, EB (Appointed RIR staff) – Was not on the call during roll call
 
APNIC
Dr Govind, DG
Izumi Okutani, IO
Craig Ng, CN (Appointed RIR staff)
 
ARIN
Bill Woodcock, BW
John Sweeting, JS
Michael Abejuala, MA (Appointed RIR staff)
 
LACNIC
Esteban Lescano, EL
Nico Scheper, NS
Andres Piazza AP (Appointed RIR staff) - Was not on the call during roll call
 
RIPE NCC
Nurani Nimpuno, NN
Andrei Robachevsky, AR
Paul Rendek, PR (Appointed RIR staff)
 
EB and AP joined the teleconference after the roll call.
 
German Valdez (GV) explained that the agenda was proposed by PR. No items were added to the agenda at this time.
 
Chair, Vice-Chair of the CRISP team:
GV read the names nominated for CRISP chair and vicenominations.
 
AR proposed a roll call vote, NN and NS supported this motion, no objections were heard so GV proceeded to conduct the roll call in order to record the votes.

The results were
 
IO: 5 votes
AB: 2 votes
EL: 1 vote
Abstentions: 2
 
GV moved to accept IO as a chair and AB as vice chair of the CRISP team. No opposition was heard and IO and AB were congratulated.
 
GV gave the floor to IO.
 
IO asked for suggestions on which items needed clarification or discussion.
 
GV suggested they decide on whether quorum would besuggested that the Secretariat could take notes that could be shared on the ianaxfer list after each teleconferences.
 
After various possibilities were proposed regardingthe tight timeline and the fact that it might hold up the process. He said it would be better to look at the decision-making process instead of focusing on the quorum.
 
IO said each region should encourage participation of at least one member (instead of defining quorum).
 
BW suggested having a 24 hour window associated with each call, so that anyone who participated online within those 24 hours could also be counted towards quorum.
 
EB noted that the CRISP charter does not define quorum for the decision-making process, so that would require changing the charter.
 
Decision-making mechanism:
 
IO said that the idea was to try to work on consensusthings would require voting.
 
GV said that the expectation was that the super-majority criteria would only be used to approve the final draft and that everything else could be decided through consensus.
 
ianaxfer at nro.net mailing list:
 
IO noted that transparency and openness are extremely important.
 
AR noted that the list is open to posting by non-CRISPpurposes (draft iterations, etc.) and using ianaxfer for transparency and seeking comments from the community.
 
BW and NN agreed. No further comments were heard, socommunicate with the community.
 
Action: GV to create a private, closed mailing list for CRISP members as soon as possible
 
Timeline for teleconferences:
 
IO said the proposed timeline seemed realistic and asked for comments.
 
BW proposed retaining the same meeting time for all meetings.
 
IO said they could discuss this further online, creating a poll with GV’s help.
 
AR said they need to have a few volunteers who can draft the first text to be submitted to the community and volunteered himself.
 
Because the first teleconference had taken placering the first draft with the community from the 15th to the 18th. He proposed splitting the material and starting to work on items 1 and 2, where there will probably not be much disagreement. Items 3 and 4 might need further debate and reaching agreements.
 
Action: GV to update draft CRISP timeline (addition ofth teleconference, first draft to be submitted to the community on December 18th).
 
IO asked for volunteers to prepare the first draft proposal.
 
CN made a brief summary of the informal discussionsthe three regions’ ideas.
 
EL and MA offered to help CN draft the comparison between the three proposals.
 
AB asked that each RIR post their proposals on the NROwas available online at
 
http://www.lacnic.net/en/web/transicion/inicio.
 
After a brief discussion regarding the date of the nextnext meeting (11 November, 13.00 UTC) and to have the team of four volunteers discuss among themselves how to best share the workload.
 
Action: Craig, Andrei, Michael, and Esteban to prepare and share a first draft of the document before the next teleconference.
 
GV said he’d have the CRISP mailing list ready and use that to send the information for the next teleconference.
 
After apologizing for having run a bit late, IO adjourned the meeting at 14.19 UTC.